This article is published in Aviation Week & Space Technology and is free to read until Mar 20, 2025. If you want to read more articles from this publication, please click the link to subscribe.

FAA Expands Substance-Testing To Non-U.S. MRO Shops

Mechanics working on engine

Foreign repair stations will be required to show compliance with the FAA’s new rule by late 2027.

Credit: AFI KLM

Fourteen years after U.S. lawmakers initially mandated the move, the FAA has finalized rules that require drug and alcohol testing in non-U.S. repair stations approved to work on U.S. aircraft.

A final rule published Dec. 18 gives affected shops three years to comply with the long-debated requirements. It attempts to walk a fine line between imposing U.S.-centric rules in non-U.S. jurisdictions and closing what some have long claimed, without meaningful data, is a gap in safety regulations.

“The final rule directs the repair station to comply with the requirements of the Drug and Alcohol Testing Program published by the FAA and the Pro­cedures for Transportation Workplace Drug Testing Programs published by the Department of Transportation, as proposed,” the FAA says in the rule’s preamble. “However, this final rule also allows foreign governments, on behalf of certificated repair stations within their territories, and individual foreign repair stations subject to the rule to obtain the [FAA] administrator’s recognition of a compatible alternative that contains minimum criteria in lieu of compliance with certain components of the Drug and Alcohol Testing Program.”

Developing a rule that takes foreign regulations into account has been one of the most debated aspects of satisfying U.S. lawmakers’ mandate. The Aero­nautical Repair Station Association (ARSA), in comments on December 2023’s draft rule, expressed concern that the FAA’s proposed waiver approach created more hurdles.

“The agency set no objective standard for obtaining an exemption or waiver,” ARSA said, adding that U.S. law may not protect foreign nationals. “The burden of imposing U.S. laws on another nation’s citizens cannot be overstated; it is the right of every nation to set standards for its citizens,” it stated.

The FAA’s response is to permit foreign governments to submit waiver requests on behalf of repair stations in their countries. This approach is unlikely to satisfy ARSA and others with similar concerns, as the burden of determining compliance with U.S. law would still likely fall on foreign repair stations in collaboration with their governments, rather than on the U.S.

“The agency has attempted to address many practical and legal concerns raised during the rulemaking by permitting foreign governments to petition for country-­level waivers,” ARSA Executive Vice President Christian Klein says. “But that won’t prevent the massive diversion of resources as industry and governments attempt to comply.”

All FAA-certified repair stations outside the U.S. are affected by the rule, regardless of whether they are located in a country covered under a bilateral maintenance agreement. The only exception is Canada because the FAA and Transport Canada recognize each other’s repair station approvals and do not issue separate certificates.

Employees of subcontractors that work on U.S.-registered Part 121 aircraft must be covered, the rule states.

The rule’s compliance date is Dec. 20, 2027, about three years from publication. The draft rule proposed a one-year compliance window.

Testing at U.S.-based shops has been required since the early 1990s and was expanded to subcontractors in 2006. Congress, via the 2012 FAA Reauthorization Act, called for expansion of testing to FAA-approved shops outside the U.S., but efforts over the last decade stalled. In 2024, Congress renewed its push to meet the 2012 mandate and gave the FAA 18 months to deliver.

Outgoing FAA Administrator Mike Whitaker called the rule “an important step in our safety mission because few countries require testing of aviation maintenance personnel.”

The Transport Workers Union (TWU), one of several labor groups that has long called for testing in all FAA shops, not just domestic ones, hailed its passage.

“This closes a major safety gap that the Transport Workers Union has fought to end for decades,” TWU International President John Samuelsen said. “And because the cost of drug and alcohol testing discourages airlines from farming repair work abroad, it creates an opportunity for more jobs to be done by qualified mechanics in America.”

The rule will affect about 980 repair stations in 66 countries, the FAA said, citing 2023 data. Total costs to affected repair stations range from $65,000 to $12.1 million per year, depending on how many submit waivers versus develop full-scale programs.

The rule does not include an associated safety risk analysis because the FAA “does not have the data” to conduct one, the agency said. “The FAA acknowledges it is aware of no accidents or incidents related to safety-sensitive maintenance personnel using drugs or misusing alcohol,” the agency added.

“The rule is a congressionally mandated solution to a problem that doesn’t exist,” ARSA’s Klein says. “The FAA itself acknowledges there isn’t enough data to articulate the benefits.”

Sean Broderick

Senior Air Transport & Safety Editor Sean Broderick covers aviation safety, MRO, and the airline business from Aviation Week Network's Washington, D.C. office.